Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-13T05:24:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/06/10 01:16, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Well, we're already not waiting for fsync, which is the slowest part. >> If there's a performance problem, it may be because FADVISE_DONTNEED >> disables kernel buffering so that we're forced to actually read the data >> back from disk before sending it on down the wire. > > Well, that's fairly direct to solve, no? Just disable FADVISE_DONTNEED > if walsenders> 0. We already do that. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com