Re: [PATCH] Fix leaky VIEWs for RLS

On 04/06/10 07:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei<kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>  writes:
>> (2010/06/04 11:55), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> A (very) important part of this problem is determining which quals are
>>> safe to push down.
>>>
>> At least, I don't have an idea to distinguish trusted functions from
>> others without any additional hints, because we support variable kind
>> of PL languages. :(
>
> The proposal some time back in this thread was to trust all built-in
> functions and no others.

I thought I debunked that idea already 
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg01428.php). Not 
all built-in functions are safe. Consider casting integer to text, for 
example. Seems innocent at first glance, but it's not; if the input is 
not a valid integer, it throws an error which contains the input string, 
revealing it.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com