Re: Configuring synchronous replication

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Csaba Nagy <ncslists@googlemail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, jd@commandprompt.com, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-23T09:02:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 23/09/10 11:34, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> In the meantime our DBs are not able to keep in sync via WAL
> replication, that would need some kind of parallel WAL restore on the
> slave I guess, or I'm not able to configure it properly - in any case
> now we use slony which is working.

It would be interesting to debug that case a bit more. Was bottlenecked 
by CPU or I/O, or network capacity perhaps?

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com