Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation?

On 09/20/2010 06:09 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Yeah, I mostly followed that thread.  If such a feature was present,
> it might well make sense to use it for this; however, I've got
> enough trouble selling the SSI technology without making it
> dependent on something else which was clearly quite controversial,
> and which seemed to have some technical hurdles of its own left to
> clear.  :-/

Okay, well understandable. I'm wondering how you want to implement the
memory allocation part, though.

> At the point where there is an implementation which is accepted by
> the community, I'll certainly take another look.

Fair enough, thanks.

Regards

Markus Wanner