Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-20T14:55:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 17/09/10 12:22, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> That said, there's a few small things that can be progressed regardless of >> the details of synchronous replication. There's the changes to trigger >> failover with a signal, and it seems that we'll need some libpq changes to >> allow acknowledgments to be sent back to the master regardless of the rest >> of the design. We can discuss those in separate threads in parallel. > > Agreed. The attached patch introduces new function which is used > to send ACK back from walreceiver. The function sends a message > to XLOG stream by calling PQputCopyData. Also I allowed PQputCopyData > to be called even during COPY OUT. Oh, that's simple. It doesn't feel right to always accept PQputCopyData in COPY OUT mode, though. IMHO there should be a new COPY IN+OUT mode. It should be pretty safe to add a CopyInOutResponse message to the protocol without a protocol version bump. Thoughts on that? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com