Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Date: 2010-09-14T08:51:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- walreceiver-latch-3.patch (text/x-diff) patch
On 14/09/10 05:02, Fujii Masao wrote: > + /* > + * Walreceiver sets this latch every time new WAL has been received and > + * fsync'd to disk, allowing startup process to wait for new WAL to > + * arrive. > + */ > + Latch receivedLatch; > > I think that this latch should be available for other than walreceiver - > startup process communication. For example, backend - startup process > communication, which can be used for requesting a failover via SQL function > by users in the future. What about putting the latch in XLogCtl instead of > WalRcv and calling OwnLatch at the beginning of the startup process instead > of RequestXLogStreaming? Yes, good point. I updated the patch along those lines, attached. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com