Re: "serializable" in comments and names

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>

From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>, Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-09-09T16:11:31Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

sernoop-v1.4.patch (text/x-patch) patch v1

On 09/08/2010 10:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of miÃ© sep 08 12:12:31 -0400 2010:
>>> AFAIR it doesn't keep the first snapshot around.  If it did, most of
>>> your work on snapshot list trimming would have been useless, no?
> 
>> That's my point precisely.  The name "IsolationUsesXactSnapshot" makes
>> it sound like it applies to any transaction that uses snapshots for
>> isolation, doesn't it?
> 
> I don't think so, at least not when compared to the alternative 
> IsolationUsesStmtSnapshot.

The attached patch is updated for the various comments, as well as some
wording tweaks by me. If there are no objections I'd like to commit this
in a day or two.

Joe

-- 
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support