Re: git: uh-oh

On 04/09/10 12:24, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> wrote:
>> and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-)
> 
> Hey, that's great.  But I wonder why Magnus got a different result.

This is the first time I've posted these incantations for excising the
unwanted history, so he would not have been using them.

> Can you post the repo you ended up with somewhere?

Well, it's a Bazaar repository at the moment :-)

But, I'll re-run it targetting git, and push it somewhere. github?
anywhere better?

I think we should start a git repository somewhere containing the
precise conversion recipe - i.e.:

 * cvs2git options file
 * cvs2git invocation command line
 * all scripts that massage the CVS repository before conversion, or the
Git repository afterwards


Max.