Re: Interruptible sleeps (was Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!)
Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-03T19:11:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> [ shrug... ] I stated before that the Hot Standby patch is doing >>> utterly unsafe things in signal handlers. Simon rejected that. >>> I am waiting for irrefutable evidence to emerge from the field >>> (and am very confident that it will be forthcoming...) [...] > >> [...]Why are >> we releasing 9.0 with this problem again? Surely this is nuts. Will the docs give enough info so that release note readers will know when they're giving well-informed consent to volunteer to produce such field evidence?