Horton

Re: "serializable" in comments and names

Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>

View thread
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Dan Ports" <drkp@csail.mit.edu>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-02T19:13:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
 
> +1 for adding parens; we might want to make a function of it
> someday.
 
Makes sense; will do.
 
> I don't much like the "XactUses..." aspect of it; that's just
> about meaningless, because almost everything in PG could be said
> to be "used" by a transaction.  How about
> IsolationUsesXactSnapshot (versus IsolationUsesStmtSnapshot)?
 
And IsolationIsSerializable to make that test symmetrical?
 
Any objections to this plan?
 
-Kevin