Re: dynamically allocating chunks from shared memory
Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>
From: Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-08-09T19:27:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 08/09/2010 09:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > As far as SLRU is concerned, the already-agreed-to plan is to get rid of > the separate arenas for SLRU and merge those things into the main shared > buffers arena. I didn't know about that plan. Sounds good. (I'm personally thinking this is trying to solve the same problem in a more specific fashion). > IIRC, the motivation for designing SLRU the way it is > was to ensure that SLRU uses couldn't be starved for memory due to high > demand for shared buffers. But that was back when people frequently ran > PG with only a few meg for shared buffers; I think that worry is > obsolete. Good to know. > So I don't see this patch as offering anything at all that we care about > so far as the core server is concerned. Maybe there are extensions that > need it badly enough to justify such a feature in core, but SLRU is not > a good argument for it. Fair enough. (Patch is already marked as "returned with feedback" on the commitfest app, thanks again for additional feedback) Regards Markus Wanner