Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review

Hi,

Kevin Grittner írta:
> Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>   
>> This time, it's this case that doesn't work :
>>     
>  
>   
>> I really feel that the timeout framework is the way to go here.
>>     
>  
> Since Zoltán also seems to feel this way:
>  
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4C516C3A.6090102@cybertec.at
>  
> I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request
> that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF.  Does anyone
> feel this approach (without the framework) should be pursued
> further?
>   

I certainly think so, the current scheme seems to be very fragile
and doesn't want to be extended.