Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review

Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> This time, it's this case that doesn't work :
 
> I really feel that the timeout framework is the way to go here.
 
Since Zoltán also seems to feel this way:
 
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4C516C3A.6090102@cybertec.at
 
I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request
that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF.  Does anyone
feel this approach (without the framework) should be pursued
further?
 
-Kevin