Re: dynamically allocating chunks from shared memory

Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: "Markus Wanner" <markus@bluegap.ch>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-07-26T19:16:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> I actually think that memory management is one of the weakest
> elements of our current architecture
 
I'm actually pretty impressed by the memory contexts in PostgreSQL. 
Apparently I'm not alone in that, either; a paper by Hellerstein,
Stonebraker, and Hamilton[1] has this in section 7.2 (Memory
Allocator):
 
"The interested reader may want to browse the open-source PostgreSQL
code. This utilizes a fairly sophisticated memory allocator."
 
I think the problem here is that we don't extend that sophistication
to shared memory.
 
-Kevin

[1] Joseph M. Hellerstein, Michael Stonebraker and James Hamilton.
2007. Architecture of a Database System. Foundations and Trends(R)
in Databases Vol. 1, No. 2 (2007) 141*259. 
http://db.cs.berkeley.edu/papers/fntdb07-architecture.pdf