Re: leaky views, yet again
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-07-21T10:35:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(2010/07/21 19:26), Robert Haas wrote: > 2010/7/21 KaiGai Kohei<kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>: >>> On the other hand, if it's enough from a performance >>> point of view to review and mark only a few built-in functions like >>> index operators, maybe it's ok. >>> >> I also think it is a worthful idea to try as a proof-of-concept. > > Yeah. So, should we mark this patch as Returned with Feedback, and > you can submit a proof-of-concept patch for the next CF? > Yes, it's fair enough. -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>