Re: Synchronous replication patch built on SR
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs@cybertec.at>
Date: 2010-05-18T20:03:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 18/05/10 07:41, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> BTW, What I'd like to see as a very first patch first is to change the >> current poll loops in walreceiver and walsender to, well, not poll. >> That's a requirement for synchronous replication, is very useful on its >> own, and requires a some design and implementation effort to get right. >> It would be nice to get that out of the way before/during we discuss the >> more user-visible behavior. > > Yeah, we should wake up the walesender from sleep to send WAL data > as soon as it's flushed. But why do we need to change the loop of > walreceiver? Or you mean changing the poll loop in the startup process? Yeah, changing the poll loop in the startup process is what I meant. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com