Re: List traffic
damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>
From: damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-05-13T13:00:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
Le 11/05/2010 19:24, Alvaro Herrera a écrit : > Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of mar may 11 09:58:34 -0400 2010: > >> If list traffic, especially on -hackers, is getting so large, should we >> look at maybe splitting it? I could easily enough split things such that >> I duplicate the subscriber list, so nobody would have to subscribe, but it >> would make it easier for ppl to filter their incoming ... ? > > Maybe we could create a separate list where people would send patches, > and keep patchless discussion on -hackers? > > Just a thought ;-) Here's a simple description of how i use and see the -hackers list. I'm what you could call a "silent reader", like many other subscribers i don't participate to the discussions but i'm happy to be able to follow them. I'm not an end-user and i'm not a developper. Just a guy that wants to follow the "making-of" this project. Sure the traffic is huge and sometimes i have thousands of unread messages. But somewhat i managed to follow the threads i'm interested in and leave asides others... If this list is split in two smaller ones, then i guess i'll follow both and it won't help me in any way. I guess it would even make things more difficult to understand. This is my modest experience. Clearly things can be improved, but speaking for myself i don't think that splitting the list is a good idea. -- damien clochard http://www.dalibo.com