no universally correct setting for fsync
Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-05-07T13:47:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Someone just posted to the -admin list with a database corrupted while running with fsync=off. I was all set to refer him to the documentation explaining why he should stop doing this, but to my surprise the documentation waffles on the issue way past what I think is reasonable. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-FSYNC There are dire-sounding statements interspersed with: | using fsync results in a performance penalty | Due to the risks involved, there is no universally correct setting | for fsync. | If you trust your operating system, your hardware, and your | utility company (or your battery backup), you can consider | disabling fsync. Isn't this a little too rosy a picture to paint? -Kevin