Re: Unsafe threading in syslogger on Windows

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I'm going to see what happens if I remove all the #ifdef WIN32 blocks in
>> syslogger, and let it use pgpipe() and select() instead of the extra
>> thread.
>
> Sounds reasonable. Let's see how big the changes are on HEAD. I'm not
> sure it's worth creating a different smaller fix for the back branches.

I tried that, and got a crash somewhere in the code that inherits the
syslogger pipe/socket to the child process. I don't understand why, and
I don't feel like debugging any deeper into that right now. If you or
someone else wants to give it a shot, that would be good. If not, I
might try again some other day after sleeping over it.

Anyway, here's the patch I had in mind for back-branches.

-- 
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com