Re: [SPAM]Re: Questions about 9.0 release note
Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Takahiro Itagaki" <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-03-31T17:07:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > This says: > > Exclusion constraints ensure that that if any two rows are > compared on the specified column(s) or expression(s) using the > specified operator(s), not all of these comparisons will return > <literal>TRUE</>. > > I think that's backwards - the last clause should say "none of > those comparisons will return <literal>TRUE</>". > > Unless I'm confused. "not all" seems correct. For example, you could be checking the room number for equality and a range of time for overlap -- both must be TRUE to have a problem; otherwise you could only schedule one thing in the room for all time and one thing at a given time across all rooms. -Kevin