Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-03-25T10:05:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:08 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> And if the trigger file is >> found, I think that the startup process should emit a FATAL, i.e., the >> server should exit immediately, to prevent the server from becoming the >> primary in a half-finished state. > > Please remember that "half-finished" is your judgment on what has > happened in the particular scenario you are considering. In many cases, > an invalid WAL record clearly and simply indicates the end of WAL and we > should start up normally. Not in the archive. An invalid WAL record in a file in pg_xlog is usually an indication of end-of-WAL, but there should be no invalid records in the archived WAL files, or streamed from the master. > "State" is a good word here. I'd like to see the server have a clear > state model with well documented transitions between them. The state > should also be externally queriable, so we can work out what its doing > and how long we can expect it to keep doing it for. Agreed. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com