Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes

Simon Riggs wrote:
>>  
>> Basically, what you feel is missing is documentation that if two
>> shapes share one or more points they are considered to overlap;
>> there is no requirement that they share an area?
>>     
>
> Yes, for most people touching != overlap. So it just looks like a bug.
>
>   

I guess I must be strange, then, it doesn't strike me as particularly 
unnatural. By all means document it, though, if the docs are not clear 
on the point.

cheers

andrew