Horton

Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-12-09T03:11:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

Greg Smith wrote:
> Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>> Can I ask the final decision whether the YAML formatter should be
>> applied or rejected?  As far as I read the discussion, we can apply it
>> because serveral users want it and we don't have a plan to support
>> extensible formatters in the core.
>>   
> The path I thought made sense at this point was to mark the patch 
> ready for a committer, since it sounds like everyone is done with it 
> now, and have another committer besides yourself do a final review as 
> part of that. 

That brings us back to where this conversation started ;-) I'll pick it up.

cheers

andrew