Horton

Re: ProcessUtility_hook

Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-12-01T11:52:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane escreveu:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> So, if someone writes a patch, and it is reviewed, and the patch author
>> updates the patch and replies, it still should be reviewed again before
>> being committed?
> 
> Well, that's for the reviewer to say --- if the update satisfies his
> concerns, he should sign off on it, if not not.  I've tried to avoid
> pre-empting that process.
> 
That's correct. I didn't have time to review the new patch yet. :( I'll do it
later today. IIRC Tom had some objections (during the last CF) the way the
patch was proposed and suggested changes. Let's see if the Takahiro-san did
everything that was suggested.


-- 
  Euler Taveira de Oliveira
  http://www.timbira.com/