Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

On 2/26/10 6:57 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> 
> Can we not wait to cancel the transaction until *any* new lock is
> attempted though? That should protect all the single-statement
> long-running transactions that are already underway. Aggregates etc.

I like this approach.  Is it fragile in some non-obvious way?

--Josh Berkus