Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-02-18T02:27:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>   
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>     
>>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump.  I think this is just waiting
>>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct.  I've been
>>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
>>> someone else would like to take a look?  This is an open item, so we
>>> should really try to deal with it.
>>>       
>
>   
>> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item.  Will look at it
>> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
>> around here: the power stays on).
>>     
>
> I've applied that patch after some revisions.
>
> The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is
> the last plperl patch.  I think that's actually done but not marked
> as committed; Andrew?
>
> 			
>   

sorry. fixed.

cheers

andrew