Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs

Robert Haas írta:
> ...
> OK, please change it.
>   

New patch is attached with the discussed changes.

>>> Someone who knows the overall structure of the code better than I do
>>> will have to comment on whether there are any code paths to worry
>>> about that do not go through PortalRun().
>>>
>>> A general concern I have is that this what we're basically doing here
>>> is handling the most common case in ProcessQuery() and then installing
>>> fallback mechanisms to pick up any stragglers: but the fallback
>>> mechanisms only guarantee that we'll add a number to the command tag,
>>> not that it will be meaningful.  Unfortunately, my limited imagination
>>> can't quite figure out in what cases we'll get a SELECT command tag
>>> back other than (1) plain old SELECT, (2) SELECT INTO, and (3) CTAS,
>>> so I'm not sure what to go test.
>>>       
>
> Any thoughts on these issues, anyone?
>
> ...Robert
>   

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

-- 
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics

----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/