Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-02-04T08:30:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(2010/02/04 0:20), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/2/1 KaiGai Kohei<kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>:
>> I again wonder whether we are on the right direction.
>
> I believe the proposed approach is to dump blob metadata if and only
> if you are also dumping blob contents, and to do all of this for data
> dumps but not schema dumps. That seems about right to me.
In other words:
<default> -> blob contents and metadata (owner, acl, comments) shall
be dumped
--data-only -> only blob contents shall be dumped
--schema-only -> neither blob contents and metadata are dumped.
Can I understand correctly?
>> Originally, the reason why we decide to use per blob toc entry was
>> that "BLOB ACLS" entry needs a few exceptional treatments in the code.
>> But, if we deal with "BLOB ITEM" entry as data contents, it will also
>> need additional exceptional treatments.
>
> But the new ones are less objectionable, maybe.
>
> ...Robert
>
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>