Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>

View thread

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>

To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>

Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2010-01-28T23:40:19Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

pgsql-fix-large_object-tag.patch (application/octect-stream) patch

(2010/01/28 18:21), Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> 
> KaiGai Kohei<kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>  wrote:
> 
>> The attached patch uses one TOC entry for each blob objects.
> 
> When I'm testing the new patch, I found "ALTER LARGE OBJECT" command
> returns "ALTER LARGEOBJECT" tag. Should it be "ALTER LARGE(space)OBJECT"
> instead?  As I remember, we had decided not to use LARGEOBJECT
> (without a space) in user-visible messages, right?

Sorry, I left for fix this tag when I was pointed out LARGEOBJECT should
be LARGE(space)OBJECT.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>