Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2010-01-26T10:36:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> *That* makes pg_standby obsolete, not streaming replication per se. >> Setting standby_mode=on, with a valid restore_command using e.g 'cp' and >> no connection info for walreceiver is more or less the same as using >> pg_standby. > > I've yet to understand how the files in the archive get from the master > to the slave in this case, or are you supposing in your example that the > cp in the restore_command is targetting a shared disk setup or > something? Yes. Just like with pg_standby. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com