Horton

Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Date: 2010-01-23T21:19:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

Robert Treat wrote:
> I'm not saying there aren't 
> downsides, but having a name the community can unify on is a definite plus, and 
> imho that name has to be Postgres.  
>   

Translation: "we'll only be unified if everyone agrees with me."

Sorry, that is quite clearly not going to happen.

Can we please get on with actually making a better product? Raising this 
issue again is simply an unnecessary distraction.

cheers

andrew