Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-15T17:30:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> Uh, do we really want to call this "replication" rather than archive log >>> streaming or something. It seems "replication" is a generic term and >>> will confuse people who are using other replication solutions like >>> Slony. >> +1, it is not replication. I would call it something like continuous >> archiving or streaming pitr > > Of course "PITR" does stand for "point-in-time replication"... I'm not sure if you're joking, but PITR actually stands for Point-In-Time *Recovery*. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com