Re: plpython3
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, James Pye <lists@jwp.name>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-13T18:16:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> My argument would be now, what is the benefit of the James Pye version > over our version. James can you illustrate succinctly why we should be > supporting a new version? > > If there is, I am still all for it, but I am a python bigot. Yeah, it's just my viewpoint that we don't want 2 python procedural languages in core. One should be in core, and one should go on pgFoundry/PGAN. Which ever one is "better" by some clear definition should go in core. As I said, I have no opinion about whether Pye's PLpython should replace the existing because I'm in no position to judge. --Josh Berkus