Re: plpython3
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: James Pye <lists@jwp.name>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-13T04:06:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> So it seems to me that the threshold question for this patch is - do > we think it's a good idea to maintain two implementations of PL/python > in core? Not really, no. This is why we need PGAN ;-) If the new implementation is *better* that the existing PL/python, I could see eventually replacing it. It wouldn't be the first time that a rewrite exceeded the original tool. However, I'm not in a position to judge quality. --Josh Berkus