Re: plpython3

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: James Pye <lists@jwp.name>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-13T04:06:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> So it seems to me that the threshold question for this patch is - do
> we think it's a good idea to maintain two implementations of PL/python
> in core?

Not really, no.  This is why we need PGAN ;-)

If the new implementation is *better* that the existing PL/python, I
could see eventually replacing it.  It wouldn't be the first time that a
rewrite exceeded the original tool.

However, I'm not in a position to judge quality.

--Josh Berkus