Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-09T22:18:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> >>> On fre, 2010-01-08 at 12:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> >>>> Do .gitignore files have the same format as .cvsignore? >>>> >>> The format is the same, but while cvsignore files currently list a few >>> dozen files, the proposed gitignore would list all files that are ever >>> build anywhere. >>> >> The charter of the .cvsignore files is to ignore files that are not in >> the repository but are nonetheless left behind after "make distclean". >> Any git-oriented replacement should behave the same IMO. >> > > Oh. Never mind. That doesn't seem useful enough to be worth spending > time on. What I want is to ignore all of the build products, so that > when I do 'git status' in my working tree, I only see the the files > I've actually added/changed. Now that you mention it, I think I had > the same complaint about the .cvsignore files back when I was using > CVS. It seems like an odd charter. > > Use a vpath build, and you'll keep those artifacts out of your source tree. cheers andrew