Re: Serializable implementation

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> I think anything you decide about how to invoke the different
> isolation levels will be easy to change later to meet whatever the
> consensus of the community is at that time.  I wouldn't spend any
> time or energy on it now.  For purposes of your prototype patch,
> using REPEATABLE READ for the current serializable and
> SERIALIZABLE for the new behavior will be plenty good enough.
 
I think the attached (so far noop) patch covers that.  This is "for
the record" for those interested; I'm not looking for review per se,
or commit.
 
-Kevin
 
P.S.  The git hints worked like a charm, and saved much flailing.