Re: Partitioning option for COPY
Emmanuel Cecchet <manu@asterdata.com>
From: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu@asterdata.com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel.Cecchet@asterdata.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-11-12T00:53:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, >> I have extracted the partitioning option for COPY (removed the error >> logging part) from the previous patch. >> > > We can use an INSERT trigger to route tuples into partitions even now. > Why do you need an additional router for COPY? Tom has already explained on the list why using a trigger was a bad idea (and I know we can use a trigger since I am the one who wrote it). If you look at the code you will see that you can do optimizations in the COPY code that you cannot do in the trigger. > Also, it would be nicer > that the router can works not only in COPY but also in INSERT. > As 8.5 will at best provide a syntactic hack on top of the existing constraint implementation, I think that it will not hurt to have routing in COPY since we will not have it anywhere otherwise. > BTW, I'm working on meta data of partitioning now. Your "partitioning" > option in COPY could be replaced with the catalog. > This implementation is only for the current 8.5 and it will not be needed anymore once we get a fully functional partitioning in Postgres which seems to be for a future version. Best regards, Emmanuel -- Emmanuel Cecchet Aster Data Web: http://www.asterdata.com