Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>
To: Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres@cybertec.at>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-05-11T19:48:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark írta: > 2009/5/11 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>: > >> Does statement_timeout counts against subtransactions as well? No. >> If a statement finishes before statement_timeout, does it also decrease >> the possible runtime for the next statement? No. I was talking about >> locks acquired during one statement. >> > > With respect I can't figure out what you're trying to say here. > Sorry, bad rhetorics. Point correctly made is below. >> He argued about he wants a timeout *independent* from statement_timeout >> for locks only inside the same statement IIRC. >>