Re: pg_restore --multi-thread

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> While I think "jobs" isn't a totally accurate description, I would still 
> propose to use -j/--jobs for the option name, because it is neutral about the 
> implementation and has a strong precedent as being used to increase the 
> parallelization to get the work done faster.  I also noticed that Andrew D. 
> used "jobs" in his own emails to comment on the feature. :-)
>
> The attached patch also updated the documentation to give some additional 
> advice about which numbers to use.
>   
>   


Looks reasonable.

cheers

andrew