Re: small parallel restore optimization
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-03-09T09:48:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Worst case, we could say that parallel restore isn't supported on >> mingw. I'm not entirely sure why we bother with that platform at all... > > I think you're confusing it with cygwin ... Yeah. Much as I hate working around the quirks of mingw, I definitely think we need to keep that platform. (yes, cygwin is another story, but let's not repeat that discussion now) //Magnus