Horton

Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)

Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: jd@commandprompt.com
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Date: 2009-02-26T05:43:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:17 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Since it's going to take us two weeks to clean up the other loose ends
>>>>> anyway, there's no harm in letting Simon and Heikki try to complete the
>>>>> patch by then.  But I'll happily lay a side bet with you about what the
>>>>> situation will be two weeks from now.
>>>> I think Tom wins this bet, since it's now been four weeks.  In fact,
>>>> he was being optimistic: the loose ends aren't cleaned up either
>>>> (based on a review of the wiki, we're about half way there: six
>>>> patches have been committed in the intervening time and seven remain
>>>> in the queue).
>>> I agree. It is time to move on.
>> Huh? What features are you saying about to be moved on?
>> Is it the updatable-view feature? or rest of all pending ones?
> 
> Tom originally stated (as I recall, no flames please) that we would wait
> for 2 weeks for the hot standby stuff. It has now been four. That is
> what I and I believe Robert Haas are talking about.

Thanks, it helps me clear.

P.S,
I would like folks not to forget SE-PostgreSQL.

-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>