Re: parallel restore vs. windows
Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>
From: Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2008-12-09T04:09:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>>> >>> Are these threads sharing memory, intentionally or by mistake? >> >> >> Things they write, and things they read but might not be stable, are >> not supposed to be shared. If they are it's a mistake. >> > > Looks like the ArchiveHandle variable 'AH' and the TocEntry > 'next_work_item' are not being deep copied at line 315 of your patch, > where you prepare the RestoreArgs struct for the thread. Every thread > is accessing and possibly updating the members of these structs that > need to be deep copied. > Forgot something, the prestore function leaks the RestoreArgs struct. -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/