Re: parallel restore vs. windows

Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>

From: Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2008-12-09T04:09:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>>>
>>> Are these threads sharing memory, intentionally or by mistake?
>>
>>
>> Things they write, and things they read but might not be stable, are 
>> not supposed to be shared. If they are it's a mistake.
>>
> 
> Looks like the ArchiveHandle variable 'AH' and the TocEntry 
> 'next_work_item' are not being deep copied at line 315 of your patch, 
> where you prepare the RestoreArgs struct for the thread.  Every thread 
> is accessing and possibly updating the members of these structs that 
> need to be deep copied.
> 

Forgot something, the prestore function leaks the RestoreArgs struct.

-- 
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/