Horton

Re: PiTR and other architectures....

Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>

View thread
From: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-12-03T00:02:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
>
> But, as Simon pointed out, is it really worth the risk? PITR is closer
> to a physical process, and it's probably wise to just assume it's not
> portable.
>   

Yeah...I am getting that impression ;-). From this I will assume we need:

 - same OS (and OS minor version?)
 - same CPU architecture

I was hoping it was a simple set of requirements, but that's life.


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 03 5330 3171          |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
http://www.rhyme.com.au <http://www.rhyme.com.au/>         
|                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
GPG key available upon request.  |  /
                                 |/