Re: [PATCH] Allow parallelism for plpgsql return expression after commit 556f7b7
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: DIPESH DHAMELIYA <dipeshdhameliya125@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-07-07T18:36:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 9:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So on the whole it seems like a research project requiring nontrivial >> effort and probably yielding only marginal gains. It's certainly not >> going to yield a back-patchable fix for this performance regression. > Yeah that's correct. OK. I pushed the one-liner (plus comment) fix. If anyone does feel like looking into allowing subplans to run in parallel in this context, it's not stopping them from doing so. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Restore the ability to run pl/pgsql expression queries in parallel.
- ae693c0bfd9e 13.22 landed
- 602c91cf2ef7 14.19 landed
- c65c36ab5195 15.14 landed
- 3bbc1c4a7338 16.10 landed
- a553a2289dbb 17.6 landed
- 440c5ee20200 18.0 landed
- 87b05fdc73e8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify executor's determination of whether to use parallelism.
- 556f7b7bc18d 17.3 cited