Thread

  1. Alias to rollback keyword

    Matthew Altus <maltus@internode.com.au> — 2010-04-01T00:42:14Z

    Hey,
    
    After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I 
    kept typing a different word instead of rollback.  So I created a patch to 
    accept this word as an alias for rollback.  Obviously it's not part of the sql 
    standard, but could be a nice extension for postgresql.  See the patch for 
    more details.
    
    Cheers
    Matt
    
  2. Re: Alias to rollback keyword

    David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> — 2010-04-01T02:33:49Z

    On Mar 31, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Matthew Altus wrote:
    
    > After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I 
    > kept typing a different word instead of rollback.  So I created a patch to 
    > accept this word as an alias for rollback.  Obviously it's not part of the sql 
    > standard, but could be a nice extension for postgresql.  See the patch for 
    > more details.
    
    +100
    
    Best,
    
    David
    
    
    
  3. Re: Alias to rollback keyword

    Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2010-04-01T02:34:41Z

    Matthew Altus wrote:
    > Hey,
    > 
    > After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I 
    > kept typing a different word instead of rollback.  So I created a patch to 
    > accept this word as an alias for rollback.  Obviously it's not part of the sql 
    > standard, but could be a nice extension for postgresql.  See the patch for 
    > more details.
    
    Applied.
    
    -- 
      Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
      EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
    
    
  4. Re: Alias to rollback keyword

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2010-04-01T02:38:42Z

    On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
    > Matthew Altus wrote:
    >> Hey,
    >>
    >> After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I
    >> kept typing a different word instead of rollback.  So I created a patch to
    >> accept this word as an alias for rollback.  Obviously it's not part of the sql
    >> standard, but could be a nice extension for postgresql.  See the patch for
    >> more details.
    >
    > Applied.
    
    You know, I was about to write a rant about this, until I realized
    what day it will be soon (or already is, UTC).
    
    ...Robert
    
    
  5. Re: Alias to rollback keyword

    Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2010-04-01T02:39:36Z

    Robert Haas wrote:
    > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
    > > Matthew Altus wrote:
    > >> Hey,
    > >>
    > >> After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I
    > >> kept typing a different word instead of rollback. ?So I created a patch to
    > >> accept this word as an alias for rollback. ?Obviously it's not part of the sql
    > >> standard, but could be a nice extension for postgresql. ?See the patch for
    > >> more details.
    > >
    > > Applied.
    > 
    > You know, I was about to write a rant about this, until I realized
    > what day it will be soon (or already is, UTC).
    
    CVS is GMT-based.
    
    -- 
      Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
      EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
    
    
  6. Re: Alias to rollback keyword

    Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm@rice.edu> — 2010-04-01T14:39:04Z

    On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:34:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
    > Matthew Altus wrote:
    > > Hey,
    > > 
    > > After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I 
    > > kept typing a different word instead of rollback.  So I created a patch to 
    > > accept this word as an alias for rollback.  Obviously it's not part of the sql 
    > > standard, but could be a nice extension for postgresql.  See the patch for 
    > > more details.
    > 
    > Applied.
    
    Hmm, a careful review of the patch leads me to believe that this is one
    of the few times that a keyword might benefit from localization. Seems
    l10n efforts in this area have mostly focused on the filtering case, but
    I'm sure we can repurose such lists. Licensing might be an issue.
    Clearly this needs to be controlled by the client locale, not the
    server. Any need for a guc? 
    
    Ross
    -- 
    Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D.                                 reedstrm@rice.edu
    Systems Engineer & Admin, Research Scientist        phone: 713-348-6166
    The Connexions Project      http://cnx.org            fax: 713-348-3665
    Rice University MS-375, Houston, TX 77005
    GPG Key fingerprint = F023 82C8 9B0E 2CC6 0D8E  F888 D3AE 810E 88F0 BEDE