Thread

  1. pg_standby supported versions

    Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> — 2008-08-13T09:59:26Z

    I noticed in the docs for pg_standby (docs/src/sgml/pgstandby.sgml) that 
    we have supported version >= 8.2. However it does seem to work ok with 
    earlier versions (e.g 8.1) - or am I missing something?
    
    cheers
    
    Mark
    
    
  2. Re: pg_standby supported versions

    Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> — 2008-08-22T05:50:00Z

    On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
    > I noticed in the docs for pg_standby (docs/src/sgml/pgstandby.sgml)  
    > that we have supported version >= 8.2. However it does seem to work  
    > ok with earlier versions (e.g 8.1) - or am I missing something?
    
    Hrm, AFAIK it works... Simon?
    -- 
    Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel@decibel.org
    Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
    
    
    
  3. Re: pg_standby supported versions

    Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> — 2008-08-26T09:30:30Z

    On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 00:50 -0500, Decibel! wrote:
    > On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
    > > I noticed in the docs for pg_standby (docs/src/sgml/pgstandby.sgml)  
    > > that we have supported version >= 8.2. However it does seem to work  
    > > ok with earlier versions (e.g 8.1) - or am I missing something?
    > 
    > Hrm, AFAIK it works... Simon?
    
    It works, yes. But in basic form only.
    
    You'll have problems stopping and starting standby, but the most
    important change is that the process is not restartable. So if you run
    it for a month and then crash, you'll need to re-run the whole month's
    WAL data.
    
    -- 
     Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
     PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
    
    
    
  4. Re: pg_standby supported versions

    Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> — 2008-11-26T09:14:58Z

    Simon Riggs wrote:
    > On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 00:50 -0500, Decibel! wrote:
    >   
    >> On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
    >>     
    >>> I noticed in the docs for pg_standby (docs/src/sgml/pgstandby.sgml)  
    >>> that we have supported version >= 8.2. However it does seem to work  
    >>> ok with earlier versions (e.g 8.1) - or am I missing something?
    >>>       
    >> Hrm, AFAIK it works... Simon?
    >>     
    >
    > It works, yes. But in basic form only.
    >
    > You'll have problems stopping and starting standby, but the most
    > important change is that the process is not restartable. So if you run
    > it for a month and then crash, you'll need to re-run the whole month's
    > WAL data.
    >
    >   
    Exactly, after posting this I discovered the relevant CVS logs for 
    changes to support restartable recovery. It seems to me that perhaps a 
    little more detail in the docs would be good here.
    
    At work some folks are using pg_standby with 8.1 and while it does work 
    quite well, it took me a wee while to figure out that some of the issues 
    they are having are tied up with inability to continue recovery after 
    restarting the database or the os!
    
    Best wishes
    
    Mark
    
    
  5. Re: pg_standby supported versions

    Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> — 2008-11-27T17:11:42Z

    On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 22:14 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
    > Simon Riggs wrote:
    > >
    > > You'll have problems stopping and starting standby, but the most
    > > important change is that the process is not restartable. So if you
    > run
    > > it for a month and then crash, you'll need to re-run the whole
    > month's
    > > WAL data.
    > >
    > >   
    > Exactly, after posting this I discovered the relevant CVS logs for 
    > changes to support restartable recovery. It seems to me that perhaps a 
    > little more detail in the docs would be good here.
    
    I would hope that the complete absence of anything would be all that is
    required to dissuade people. We don't ever update the docs to say "BTW
    feature X is not supported until next release". Not sure we should start
    now.
    
    -- 
     Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
     PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
    
    
    
  6. Re: pg_standby supported versions

    Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> — 2008-11-27T18:56:09Z

    Simon Riggs wrote:
    > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 22:14 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
    >   
    >>
    >> Exactly, after posting this I discovered the relevant CVS logs for 
    >> changes to support restartable recovery. It seems to me that perhaps a 
    >> little more detail in the docs would be good here.
    >>     
    >
    > I would hope that the complete absence of anything would be all that is
    > required to dissuade people. We don't ever update the docs to say "BTW
    > feature X is not supported until next release". Not sure we should start
    > now.
    >
    >   
    
    While I understand, I also think it is perfectly reasonable to clarify 
    why a specific minimum version is being recommended. To me this conforms 
    to the open source spirit of telling folk why something is true, as 
    opposed to stating that it is.
    
    I'm thinking of something like:
    
    <para>
    
    pg_standby is designed to work with PostgreSQL 8.2 and later, as it 
    requires the ability to interrupt and restart recovery (absent in 
    earlier server versions).
    
    </para>