Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions?

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Xing Guo <higuoxing@gmail.com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2023-12-14T10:19:38Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

jit: Require at least LLVM 14, if enabled.
- 972c2cd2882b 18.0 landed
jit: Require at least LLVM 10.
- 820b5af73dcc 17.0 landed

On 25.10.23 07:47, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Ideally more distros would be present in this vacuum-horizon decision
> table, but I don't think it'd change the conclusion: 10 is the
> trailing edge.  Therefore the attached patch scales back its ambition
> to that release.  Tested on LLVM 10-18.

This patch and the associated reasoning look good to me.  I think this 
is good to go for PG17.