Re: file system and raid performance
Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: greg@tcscs.com
Cc: 'Mark Wong' <markwkm@gmail.com>, david@lang.hm, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, 'Gabrielle Roth' <gorthx@gmail.com>
Date: 2008-08-07T09:40:00Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Mark Kirkwood wrote: > You are right, it does (I may be recalling performance from my other > machine that has a 3Ware card - this was a couple of years ago...) > Anyway, I'm thinking for the Hardware raid tests they may need to be > specified. > > FWIW - of course this somewhat academic given that the single disk xfs test failed! I'm puzzled - having a Gentoo system of similar configuration (2.6.25-gentoo-r6) and running the fio tests a little modified for my config (2 cpu PIII 2G RAM with 4x ATA disks RAID0 and all xfs filesystems - I changed sizes of files to 4G and no. processes to 4) all tests that failed on Marks HP work on my Supermicro P2TDER + Promise TX4000. In fact the performance is pretty reasonable on the old girl as well (seq read is 142Mb/s and the random read/write is 12.7/12.0 Mb/s). I certainly would like to see some more info on why the xfs tests were failing - as on most systems I've encountered xfs is a great performer. regards Mark