Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

> (a) that's not back-patchable and (b) it'll create a merge conflict with
> your patch, if you're still going to add a new AM function column.
> I think that aminsertcleanup per se isn't needed, but if we want an
> "amanalyze" there'd still be a conflict.  Where are we on that?

I'll revert aminsertcleanup framework but leave gininsertcleanup function as is, 
because I'll not have enough time until end of summer - I'd like to finalize 
patch and fixes first.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/