Re: How to Sponsor a Feature
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: "Decibel!" <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2008-06-12T22:06:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Decibel! wrote: > On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Greg Smith wrote: >>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> >>>> If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to >>>> deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development, >>>> the sponsor's relationship with the developer, methods and times of >>>> payment, etc. >>> >>> The bit on the wiki is helpful for developers trying to get a new >>> feature >>> implemented but I think that's where its scope ends. >> >> We discussed this in the PGCon dev's meeting, and the outcome of the >> discussion was that we needed to put up a wiki page explaining to those >> trying to pledge the money what to do and what to expect. David took >> the first step by writing the page being complained about. >> >> If the page doesn't explain what the title says, then the contents of >> the page needs to be fixed (not the title). > > So were there decisions in the dev meeting about how the community > wants to handle people wanting to sponsor a project? Do they donate to > SPI? Do we have an escrow fund? Do we just point them at one of the > "Postgres Companies" and hope they're willing to pay for the whole thing? > Who said anything about there being decisions? The only decision made was to create this docvument, AFAIR. cheers andrew